Part C · unit 24 · problems

Maxwell: the displacement current, and light

Checkpoint. On paper and without notes, you can derive the displacement current from charge conservation alone, by taking the divergence of Ampère's law, and say what hypotheses make it the only repair; obtain the vacuum wave equation and compute \(c\) from \(\varepsilon_0\) and \(\mu_0\); compute the retarded Green's function of \(\Box\) by contour integration, proving it vanishes for \(t \lt 0\) by closing the contour, with a defensible account of why that prescription is the causal one; and show that two different gauges produce identical \(\vec E\) and \(\vec B\).

Work each problem on paper first. Under it, Hints opens a ladder one rung at a time — each rung appears only once the one before it is open, and the last gives the first line of the working — and Worked solution has the whole thing: the idea, the working, then a check. Read the solution after your attempt, including when you got it right. F folds everything back; D switches dark and light.

Thirteen problems, about six hours. SI units throughout. The wave operator is \(\Box = c^{-2}\partial_t^2 - \nabla^2\) with \(c = 1/\sqrt{\varepsilon_0\mu_0}\); the time transform is unit 20's, \(\hat f(\omega) = \int f(t)e^{i\omega t}\,\mathrm dt\), and a plane wave is \(e^{i(\vec k\cdot\vec x - \omega t)}\). Cylindrical coordinates are \((s,\phi,z)\), spherical \((r,\theta,\phi)\). \(G_\mathrm{ret}(\vec x,t) = \delta(t - r/c)/4\pi r\) is the deck's retarded Green's function, and \(M_r[h](\vec x)\) the average of \(h\) over the sphere of radius \(r\) about \(\vec x\).

Constants: \(\varepsilon_0 = 8.8541878128\times10^{-12}\ \mathrm{F\,m^{-1}}\), \(\mu_0 = 1.25663706212\times10^{-6}\ \mathrm{N\,A^{-2}}\), \(c = 2.99792458\times10^{8}\ \mathrm{m\,s^{-1}}\), \(e = 1.602176634\times10^{-19}\) C, \(m_e = 9.1093837\times10^{-31}\) kg, Bohr radius \(a_0 = 5.29177\times10^{-11}\) m.

The displacement current and the complete system

P1 Two constants, one speed routine

exercises: dimensional analysis of \(\varepsilon_0\) and \(\mu_0\), computing \(c\), the impedance of free space

Take as definitions Coulomb's law, \(F = q_1q_2/4\pi\varepsilon_0r^2\), and the force per unit length between two long parallel wires a distance \(s\) apart, \(F/L = \mu_0I_1I_2/2\pi s\).

  1. Find the SI units of \(\varepsilon_0\) and of \(\mu_0\) in terms of N, C, m and s, and show that \(\varepsilon_0\mu_0\) has the units of an inverse squared speed.
  2. Compute \(1/\sqrt{\varepsilon_0\mu_0}\) to six significant figures.
  3. Show that \(Z_0 = \sqrt{\mu_0/\varepsilon_0}\) has the units of a resistance, compute it, and show that for a plane wave in vacuum \(|\vec E|/|\vec H| = Z_0\), where \(\vec H = \vec B/\mu_0\).
  4. Weber and Kohlrausch's ratio of units, as Maxwell used it, was \(3.1074\times10^8\ \mathrm{m\,s^{-1}}\). By what percentage was it high?
Hints · 3 rungs
Rung 1

Parts 1 and 3 are bookkeeping with units; parts 2 and 4 are single numbers. Nothing beyond the two force laws and \(\mathrm A = \mathrm{C\,s^{-1}}\) is needed.

Rung 2

Solve each force law for its constant and read off the units. For the resistance, use \(\mathrm J = \mathrm{N\,m} = \mathrm{V\,C}\) and \(\Omega = \mathrm{V\,A^{-1}}\). For the plane wave, the deck's plane-wave theorem gives \(|\vec B| = |\vec E|/c\).

Rung 3

First line: \(\varepsilon_0 = q_1q_2/4\pi Fr^2\), so \([\varepsilon_0] = \mathrm{C^2\,N^{-1}m^{-2}}\); and \(\mu_0 = 2\pi sF/(LI_1I_2)\), so \([\mu_0] = \mathrm{N\,A^{-2}}\).

Worked solution

Idea. Electrostatics and magnetostatics each define one constant, and together they contain a speed. That speed is a prediction before it is a coincidence.

1. \([\varepsilon_0] = \mathrm{C^2N^{-1}m^{-2}}\) and \([\mu_0] = \mathrm{N\,A^{-2}} = \mathrm{N\,s^2C^{-2}}\). Multiplying, the newtons and coulombs cancel: \[ [\varepsilon_0\mu_0] = \mathrm{C^2N^{-1}m^{-2}}\cdot\mathrm{N\,s^2C^{-2}} = \mathrm{s^2\,m^{-2}} . \]

2. \(\varepsilon_0\mu_0 = 1.112650\times10^{-17}\ \mathrm{s^2m^{-2}}\), so \(1/\sqrt{\varepsilon_0\mu_0} = 2.99792\times10^8\ \mathrm{m\,s^{-1}}\).

3. \([\mu_0/\varepsilon_0] = \mathrm{N\,s^2C^{-2}}/\mathrm{C^2N^{-1}m^{-2}} = \mathrm{N^2s^2m^2C^{-4}}\), so \([Z_0] = \mathrm{N\,m\,s\,C^{-2}} = \mathrm{J\,s\,C^{-2}} = \mathrm{V\,C\,s\,C^{-2}} = \mathrm{V\,s\,C^{-1}} = \mathrm{V\,A^{-1}} = \Omega\). Numerically \(Z_0 = \sqrt{1.25663706\times10^{-6}/8.85418781\times10^{-12}} = 376.730\ \Omega\). For a plane wave \(|\vec H| = |\vec B|/\mu_0 = |\vec E|/(\mu_0c)\), so \(|\vec E|/|\vec H| = \mu_0c = \mu_0/\sqrt{\varepsilon_0\mu_0} = \sqrt{\mu_0/\varepsilon_0} = Z_0\).

4. \(3.1074/2.99792 = 1.0365\): 3.65 per cent high.

Check. The units in part 3 are those of a resistance, and the value is familiar to engineers: an antenna matched to free space presents about \(377\ \Omega\). Limit: if magnetism were absent (\(\mu_0\to0\)), \(Z_0\to0\) and \(c\to\infty\) — the electrostatic world, with instantaneous action ✓.

P2 The capacitor at 50 Hz and at 1 GHz medium

exercises: Ampère–Maxwell and Faraday in integral form, the quasi-static expansion, Bessel's equation

The deck's capacitor (circular plates of radius \(a = 5.00\) cm, gap small) is now driven so that, on its axis, the field between the plates is \(E_z(0,t) = \hat E\cos\omega t\). Ignore fringing and assume \(\vec E = E_z(s,t)\hat z\), \(\vec B = B_\phi(s,t)\hat\phi\) between the plates.

  1. Treating \(E_z\) as uniform, \(E_z = \hat E\cos\omega t\), find \(B_\phi(s,t)\) from Ampère–Maxwell.
  2. Now use Faraday's law to find the first correction to \(E_z(s,t)\), and show \(E_z(s,t) = \hat E\cos\omega t\,\big(1 - \omega^2s^2/4c^2\big)\) to this order.
  3. Evaluate the relative correction at the rim for \(50\) Hz and for \(1\) GHz.
  4. Show that the exact field of this form satisfies \(f'' + f'/s + k^2f = 0\) for \(E_z = f(s)\cos\omega t\), \(k = \omega/c\), identify the solution regular on the axis, and compare its value at the rim at \(1\) GHz with part 2.
Hints · 3 rungs
Rung 1

The answers are functions of \(s\) and \(t\), then two numbers, then a special function from unit 09. The method is to alternate the two curl equations: \(\partial_t\vec E\) makes \(\vec B\), then \(\partial_t\vec B\) corrects \(\vec E\).

Rung 2

For part 1 use a circle of radius \(s\) about the axis, as in the deck. For part 2 use the \(\hat\phi\)-component of \(\nabla\times\vec E = -\partial_t\vec B\): with only \(E_z\) nonzero it reads \(-\partial_sE_z = -\partial_tB_\phi\).

Rung 3

First line: \(2\pi s\,B_\phi = \mu_0\varepsilon_0\,\partial_tE_z\,\pi s^2\), so \(B_\phi = \frac{s}{2c^2}\partial_tE_z = -\frac{\omega s}{2c^2}\hat E\sin\omega t\).

Worked solution

Idea. Quasi-statics is the first term of an expansion in \(\omega s/c\). Each application of the two induction laws brings one more factor \((\omega s/c)^2\), and the series they build is a Bessel function.

1. Ampère–Maxwell through the disc of radius \(s\), with no conduction current in the gap: \(2\pi sB_\phi = \mu_0\varepsilon_0\pi s^2\partial_tE_z\), so \[ B_\phi(s,t) = \frac{s}{2c^2}\,\partial_tE_z = -\frac{\omega s}{2c^2}\,\hat E\sin\omega t . \]

2. In cylindrical coordinates \((\nabla\times\vec E)_\phi = \partial_zE_s - \partial_sE_z = -\partial_sE_z\). Faraday: \(\partial_sE_z = \partial_tB_\phi = \frac{s}{2c^2}\partial_t^2E_z\). With \(\partial_t^2E_z = -\omega^2\hat E\cos\omega t\) at leading order, integrate from the axis: \[ E_z(s,t) = \hat E\cos\omega t - \frac{\omega^2s^2}{4c^2}\hat E\cos\omega t = \hat E\cos\omega t\Big(1 - \frac{\omega^2s^2}{4c^2}\Big). \]

3. At the rim the relative correction is \((\omega a/c)^2/4\). At 50 Hz, \(\omega a/c = 2\pi(50)(0.05)/2.998\times10^8 = 5.24\times10^{-8}\) and the correction is \(6.9\times10^{-16}\). At 1 GHz, \(\omega a/c = 1.048\) and the correction is \(0.2745\): the "correction" is a quarter of the answer, and the quasi-static picture has failed.

4. Curl Faraday and use Ampère–Maxwell in the gap: \(\nabla^2\vec E = c^{-2}\partial_t^2\vec E\). For \(E_z = f(s)\cos\omega t\) the Laplacian in cylindrical coordinates gives \(f'' + f'/s = -k^2f\), which is Bessel's equation of order \(0\) in the variable \(ks\) (unit 09). The solution regular at \(s = 0\) with \(f(0) = \hat E\) is \(f = \hat E J_0(ks)\), and \(J_0(x) = 1 - x^2/4 + x^4/64 - \dots\), whose first two terms are part 2. At 1 GHz, \(J_0(1.048) = 0.7437\), against \(1 - 0.2745 = 0.7255\) from part 2 and \(0.7443\) with the \(x^4/64\) term added.

Check. Dimensions: \([sB_\phi] \) and \([s^2\partial_tE/c^2]\) agree, both \(\mathrm{T\,m}\); \(\omega^2s^2/c^2\) is dimensionless ✓. Limit \(\omega\to0\): no correction, the steady-current capacitor of the deck ✓. The rim field at 50 Hz: with \(\hat E\) such that the plate current amplitude is \(1\) A, \(B_\phi(a) = 4.00\ \mu\)T in amplitude — the deck's number, now oscillating.

P3 Proof: the constraints propagate medium

exercises: proof, the divergence of a curl, evolution equations versus constraints, why Ampère's original law is inconsistent

Let \(\vec E, \vec B\) be \(C^2\) on \(\mathbb R^3\times\mathbb R\) and \(\rho, \vec J\) be \(C^1\).

  1. Prove: if the two curl equations of Maxwell's system hold for all \(t\), if \(\partial_t\rho + \nabla\cdot\vec J = 0\), and if \(\nabla\cdot\vec E = \rho/\varepsilon_0\) and \(\nabla\cdot\vec B = 0\) hold at \(t = 0\), then they hold for all \(t\).
  2. Prove conversely that all four equations together imply \(\partial_t\rho + \nabla\cdot\vec J = 0\).
  3. Replace Ampère–Maxwell by Ampère's original \(\nabla\times\vec B = \mu_0\vec J\), keeping the other three. Prove the resulting system has no solution for any sources with \(\partial_t\rho\ne0\) somewhere.
  4. Of the eight scalar equations, how many are evolution equations for the six unknowns? Explain in one sentence why the system is not over-determined.
Hints · 3 rungs
Rung 1

Parts 1–3 are short proofs whose only tool is \(\nabla\cdot(\nabla\times\vec V) = 0\) together with commuting \(\partial_t\) past a spatial derivative. Part 4 is a count.

Rung 2

In part 1 differentiate the two constraint quantities, \(\nabla\cdot\vec B\) and \(\varepsilon_0\nabla\cdot\vec E - \rho\), in time, and show each has zero time derivative. In part 3 take the divergence of Ampère's original law.

Rung 3

First line of part 1: \(\partial_t(\nabla\cdot\vec B) = \nabla\cdot\partial_t\vec B = -\nabla\cdot(\nabla\times\vec E) = 0\).

Worked solution

Idea. The divergence of a curl vanishes, so taking the divergence of an evolution equation gives an equation for how the corresponding constraint changes. Charge conservation is exactly what makes Gauss's constraint stationary.

1. Clairaut (all fields \(C^2\)) lets \(\partial_t\) pass through \(\nabla\cdot\). First, \(\partial_t(\nabla\cdot\vec B) = -\nabla\cdot(\nabla\times\vec E) = 0\), so \(\nabla\cdot\vec B\) is constant in time, hence \(0\). Second, let \(C = \varepsilon_0\nabla\cdot\vec E - \rho\). Then \[ \partial_tC = \nabla\cdot(\varepsilon_0\partial_t\vec E) - \partial_t\rho = \nabla\cdot\big(\mu_0^{-1}\nabla\times\vec B - \vec J\big) - \partial_t\rho = -\nabla\cdot\vec J - \partial_t\rho = 0 , \] so \(C\) is constant in time, hence \(0\). \(\square\)

2. Divergence of Ampère–Maxwell: \(0 = \mu_0\nabla\cdot\vec J + \mu_0\varepsilon_0\partial_t\nabla\cdot\vec E = \mu_0(\nabla\cdot\vec J + \partial_t\rho)\), using Gauss in the last step. \(\square\)

3. Divergence of \(\nabla\times\vec B = \mu_0\vec J\) gives \(\nabla\cdot\vec J = 0\). Charge conservation — which holds for any physical sources, and which the problem asks us to respect — then gives \(\partial_t\rho = 0\) everywhere. So if \(\partial_t\rho\ne0\) at some point, no \(C^2\) field \(\vec B\) can satisfy the equation there: the system has no solution. \(\square\) (Without assuming continuity, the system forces \(\nabla\cdot\vec J = 0\), which is equally false on a charging plate.)

4. Six: the three components of each curl equation. The two divergence equations contain no time derivative, and part 1 shows they are preserved by the six evolution equations once they hold initially, so they restrict the initial data rather than competing with the evolution.

Check. On the deck's capacitor: \(\nabla\cdot\vec B = 0\) for \(\vec B = B(s)\hat\phi\) ✓ (a purely azimuthal field depending on \(s\) has zero divergence), and \(\varepsilon_0\nabla\cdot\vec E = 0 = \rho\) in the gap for uniform \(\vec E\) ✓, at every instant, as part 1 promises.

Energy, momentum and plane waves

P4 Heat enters a resistor through its side routine

exercises: the Poynting vector, Poynting's theorem integrated over a region, a number

A straight copper wire of radius \(b = 1.00\) mm and length \(L = 1.00\) m, resistivity \(1.68\times10^{-8}\ \Omega\,\mathrm m\), carries a steady current \(I = 1.00\) A. Inside, \(\vec E\) is uniform and along the wire, and the tangential component of \(\vec E\) is continuous across the surface.

  1. Find \(\vec E\) and \(\vec B\) just outside the surface of the wire, and the Poynting vector there — its direction and its magnitude.
  2. Compute the total power flowing through the curved surface and compare it with \(I^2R\).
  3. Prove that for any straight cylindrical resistor with a uniform current the power through the side is exactly \(VI\), with \(V\) the voltage across it.
Hints · 3 rungs
Rung 1

A vector field on the surface, then a number in watts, then a two-line proof. The direction of \(\vec S\) is the surprise.

Rung 2

\(E = V/L = IR/L\), with \(R = \rho_\mathrm{Cu}L/\pi b^2\). Ampère's law gives \(B\) at radius \(b\). The curved surface has area \(2\pi bL\); \(\vec E\) is along \(\hat z\) and \(\vec B\) along \(\hat\phi\).

Rung 3

First line: \(\vec S = \frac1{\mu_0}E\hat z\times\frac{\mu_0I}{2\pi b}\hat\phi = -\frac{EI}{2\pi b}\hat s\).

Worked solution

Idea. The energy dissipated in the wire does not travel along it; it arrives from the surrounding space, radially inward, as Poynting found in 1884.

1. \(R = 1.68\times10^{-8}\times1.00/(\pi\times10^{-6}) = 5.348\times10^{-3}\ \Omega\), so \(V = IR = 5.348\) mV and \(E = V/L = 5.348\times10^{-3}\ \mathrm{V\,m^{-1}}\) along \(\hat z\), the direction of the current. Ampère: \(B = \mu_0I/2\pi b = 2.000\times10^{-4}\) T along \(\hat\phi\). Since \(\hat z\times\hat\phi = -\hat s\), \(\vec S = -\frac{EB}{\mu_0}\hat s\): radially inward, with magnitude \(EB/\mu_0 = (5.348\times10^{-3})(2.000\times10^{-4})/(1.2566\times10^{-6}) = 0.8511\ \mathrm{W\,m^{-2}}\).

2. Area \(2\pi bL = 6.283\times10^{-3}\ \mathrm{m^2}\); power in \(= 0.8511\times6.283\times10^{-3} = 5.348\) mW. And \(I^2R = 5.348\) mW ✓.

3. \(|\vec S|\cdot2\pi bL = \frac{E}{\mu_0}\cdot\frac{\mu_0I}{2\pi b}\cdot2\pi bL = EIL = VI\), independent of \(b\) and of the material. Poynting's theorem for the wire's volume with steady fields (\(\partial_tu = 0\)) says the inward flux equals \(\int\vec J\cdot\vec E = JE\cdot\pi b^2L = IEL\) ✓ — the same statement. \(\square\)

Check. Dimensions: \([EI L] = \mathrm{V\,m^{-1}\,A\,m} = \mathrm W\) ✓. Limit: a perfect conductor has \(E = 0\), so \(\vec S\) has no radial component and nothing enters: no dissipation ✓. The end faces carry no flux because \(\vec S\) is radial.

P5 Two hemispheres, pushed apart by the stress tensor medium

exercises: the Maxwell stress tensor as a bilinear form, surface integrals of it, the transformation law, a number

A thin spherical shell of radius \(R\) carries total charge \(Q\) spread uniformly over it.

  1. Using the Maxwell stress tensor on a closed surface enclosing the northern hemisphere, find the force the southern hemisphere exerts on the northern one.
  2. Evaluate it for \(Q = 1.00\ \mu\)C and \(R = 10.0\) cm.
  3. Prove from the definition that \(\sum_iT_{ii} = -u\) in every orthonormal basis, and explain why the transformation law makes this basis-independent.
Hints · 3 rungs
Rung 1

A vector (by symmetry, along \(\hat z\)), a number in newtons, and a short proof about the trace of a bilinear form.

Rung 2

Enclose the northern charge in the hemisphere of radius just over \(R\) closed by the flat equatorial disc. On the disc (inside the shell) \(\vec E = \vec 0\). On the hemisphere, \(\vec E = \frac{Q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0R^2}\hat r\) and the outward normal is \(\hat r\). The static force is \(F_z = \oint T(\hat n,\hat z)\,\mathrm dA\).

Rung 3

First line: \(T(\hat r,\hat z) = \varepsilon_0\big[(\vec E\cdot\hat r)(\vec E\cdot\hat z) - \frac12E^2\,\hat r\cdot\hat z\big] = \frac{\varepsilon_0}2E^2\cos\theta\).

Worked solution

Idea. The stress tensor needs only the total field on a surface, not the split into "the field of the other half" and "the field of this half", which here would be hard.

1. Static fields, so \(\vec g\) plays no part and the force on the charges inside is \(\oint T(\hat n,\cdot)\,\mathrm dA\). On the disc \(\vec E = \vec 0\), so \(T = 0\) there (the thin annulus between \(R\) and \(R + \epsilon\) contributes nothing as \(\epsilon\to0\)). On the hemisphere, with \(E = Q/4\pi\varepsilon_0R^2\): \[ F_z = \int_0^{2\pi}\!\!\int_0^{\pi/2}\frac{\varepsilon_0}{2}E^2\cos\theta\,R^2\sin\theta\,\mathrm d\theta\,\mathrm d\phi = \frac{\varepsilon_0}{2}E^2\cdot\pi R^2 = \frac{Q^2}{32\pi\varepsilon_0R^2}. \] By symmetry \(F_x = F_y = 0\). The force is along \(+\hat z\): the halves repel.

2. \(F = (10^{-6})^2/(32\pi\times8.854\times10^{-12}\times0.0100) = 0.1123\) N.

3. In an orthonormal basis, \(T_{ii} = \varepsilon_0(E_i^2 - \frac12|\vec E|^2) + \mu_0^{-1}(B_i^2 - \frac12|\vec B|^2)\), and summing over \(i\): \(\varepsilon_0(|\vec E|^2 - \frac32|\vec E|^2) + \mu_0^{-1}(|\vec B|^2 - \frac32|\vec B|^2) = -u\). Under a change of orthonormal basis \(T' = R^\top TR\) with \(R\) orthogonal, and \(\operatorname{tr}(R^\top TR) = \operatorname{tr}(TRR^\top) = \operatorname{tr}T\). So the trace is a property of the bilinear form, not of the basis — as it must be, since \(u\) is. \(\square\)

Another way

The outward pressure on a charged conducting-style surface is \(\sigma\cdot\frac12(E_\mathrm{out} + E_\mathrm{in}) = \sigma^2/2\varepsilon_0\), with \(\sigma = Q/4\pi R^2\) (the charge feels the average of the fields on its two sides). Its \(z\)-component over the northern hemisphere: \(\frac{\sigma^2}{2\varepsilon_0}\int\cos\theta\,\mathrm dA = \frac{\sigma^2}{2\varepsilon_0}\pi R^2 = \frac{Q^2}{32\pi\varepsilon_0R^2}\) ✓.

Check. Dimensions: \([Q^2/\varepsilon_0R^2]\) is Coulomb's force ✓. Scaling: halving \(R\) quadruples the force, as for two point charges ✓. Compared with two point charges \(Q/2\) at the hemispheres' centroids (\(R/2\) from the centre, so \(R\) apart), \(\frac{(Q/2)^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0R^2} = \frac{Q^2}{16\pi\varepsilon_0R^2}\): twice as large, plausibly, since the real charge is spread and much of it is far from the other half.

P6 Sunlight, and an ellipse of polarisation routine

exercises: plane-wave relations, time averages, radiation pressure, the polarisation ellipse by singular values

  1. Sunlight reaches the Earth with intensity \(1361\ \mathrm{W\,m^{-2}}\). Treating it as one plane wave, find the amplitudes \(E_0\) and \(B_0\), and the pressure on a black surface and on a perfect mirror facing the Sun.
  2. A wave along \(\hat z\) has complex amplitude \(\vec E_0 = (1,\ 1 + i,\ 0)\) (in V m\(^{-1}\)). Show it is elliptically polarised, and find the semi-axes of the ellipse, the angle its major axis makes with \(\hat x\), and the sense in which \(\vec E\) turns.
Hints · 3 rungs
Rung 1

Part 1 is four numbers from \(\langle S\rangle = \frac12\varepsilon_0cE_0^2\). Part 2 is a linear-algebra problem: an ellipse is the image of a circle under a \(2\times2\) matrix.

Rung 2

For a mirror the momentum of the light is reversed, not absorbed. For part 2, write \(\vec E_0 = \vec a + i\vec b\); at \(\vec x = \vec 0\), \(\vec E(t) = \vec a\cos\omega t + \vec b\sin\omega t = L(\cos\omega t, \sin\omega t)^\top\) with \(L\) the matrix whose columns are \(\vec a, \vec b\).

Rung 3

First line of part 2: \(\vec a = (1,1)\), \(\vec b = (0,1)\), \(\vec a\cdot\vec b = 1\ne0\); the semi-axes are the square roots of the eigenvalues of \(LL^\top = \vec a\vec a^\top + \vec b\vec b^\top = \begin{pmatrix}1&1\\1&2\end{pmatrix}\).

Worked solution

Idea. A plane wave is fixed by one amplitude; the polarisation ellipse is the singular-value decomposition of a \(2\times2\) matrix.

1. \(E_0 = \sqrt{2S/\varepsilon_0c} = \sqrt{2\times1361/(8.854\times10^{-12}\times2.998\times10^8)} = 1013\ \mathrm{V\,m^{-1}}\). \(B_0 = E_0/c = 3.38\ \mu\)T. Momentum flux \(S/c\): on a black surface \(4.54\ \mu\)Pa; on a mirror, where the momentum is reversed, twice that, \(9.08\ \mu\)Pa.

2. \(\vec a\cdot\vec b = 1\ne0\), so the ellipse is neither a segment (\(\vec a\not\parallel\vec b\)) nor a circle. The ellipse \(\{L(\cos\theta,\sin\theta)\}\) has semi-axes equal to the singular values of \(L\), the square roots of the eigenvalues of \(LL^\top = \begin{pmatrix}1&1\\1&2\end{pmatrix}\): \(\lambda = \frac{3\pm\sqrt5}{2} = 2.618,\ 0.382\), so the semi-axes are \(1.618\) and \(0.618\) V m\(^{-1}\) — the golden ratio and its reciprocal. The major axis is the eigenvector for \(2.618\): \((1-2.618)v_1 + v_2 = 0\), \(v_2 = 1.618v_1\), at \(\arctan1.618 = 58.28°\) from \(\hat x\). Sense: at \(t = 0\) \(\vec E = (1,1)\), a quarter-period later \((0,1)\): turning from \(45°\) towards \(90°\), anticlockwise about \(+\hat z\).

Check. The product of the semi-axes is \(|\det L| = |1\cdot1 - 0\cdot1| = 1 = 1.618\times0.618\) ✓, and the sum of their squares is \(|\vec a|^2 + |\vec b|^2 = 3 = 2.618 + 0.382\) ✓. Energy: \(\langle u\rangle = \frac{\varepsilon_0}2\vec E_0\cdot\overline{\vec E_0} = \frac{\varepsilon_0}{2}\cdot3\), which is the ellipse's mean squared radius times \(\varepsilon_0\) ✓.

Potentials and gauge

P7 Proof: reaching Lorenz gauge, and what is left medium

exercises: gauge transformations, the retarded solution as an existence theorem, residual freedom, counting polarisations

  1. Let \((\varphi,\vec A)\) be \(C^3\) potentials such that \(L = \nabla\cdot\vec A + c^{-2}\partial_t\varphi\) vanishes outside a bounded set in \(\vec x\) at each time and for all \(t \lt T_0\). Prove there is a gauge transformation after which \(L = 0\).
  2. Prove that a gauge transformation preserves the Lorenz condition iff \(\Box\chi = 0\).
  3. In vacuum, take a plane wave in Lorenz gauge: \(\varphi = \operatorname{Re}\big(\varphi_0e^{i\theta}\big)\), \(\vec A = \operatorname{Re}\big(\vec A_0e^{i\theta}\big)\), \(\theta = \vec k\cdot\vec x - \omega t\), \(\omega = c|\vec k|\). Find a residual \(\chi\) that makes \(\varphi = 0\), and show that the new \(\vec A_0\) is then perpendicular to \(\vec k\).
  4. Conclude that the physical plane waves with a given \(\vec k\) form a two-dimensional complex space.
Hints · 3 rungs
Rung 1

Each part is a short argument. The existence in part 1 comes from a theorem in the deck about solving \(\Box u = f\); parts 3 and 4 are linear algebra on the complex amplitudes.

Rung 2

Compute how \(L\) changes under \(\varphi\mapsto\varphi - \partial_t\chi\), \(\vec A\mapsto\vec A + \nabla\chi\). For part 3, take \(\chi = \operatorname{Re}(\chi_0e^{i\theta})\), which satisfies \(\Box\chi = 0\) because \(\omega = c|\vec k|\), and choose the complex number \(\chi_0\).

Rung 3

First line: \(L\mapsto\nabla\cdot\vec A + \nabla^2\chi + c^{-2}\partial_t\varphi - c^{-2}\partial_t^2\chi = L - \Box\chi\). For part 3, \(\varphi_0\mapsto\varphi_0 + i\omega\chi_0\).

Worked solution

Idea. The gauge condition changes by \(-\Box\chi\), so reaching it means solving a wave equation, and keeping it means \(\chi\) solves the free one. For a plane wave the remaining freedom removes \(\varphi\) and the longitudinal part of \(\vec A\), leaving two polarisations.

1. Under the transformation, \(L\mapsto L + \nabla^2\chi - c^{-2}\partial_t^2\chi = L - \Box\chi\). By the deck's retarded-solution theorem (with \(f = L\), which is \(C^2\) and has the required support), \(\chi = G_\mathrm{ret} * L\) is \(C^2\) and solves \(\Box\chi = L\). With this \(\chi\) the new \(L\) is \(0\). \(\square\) (The new potentials are \(C^1\) at least, enough for the fields.)

2. Starting from \(L = 0\), the new \(L\) is \(-\Box\chi\), which is zero iff \(\Box\chi = 0\). \(\square\)

3. Lorenz condition on the amplitudes: \(i\vec k\cdot\vec A_0 - i\omega\varphi_0/c^2 = 0\), i.e. \(\vec k\cdot\vec A_0 = \omega\varphi_0/c^2\). With \(\chi = \operatorname{Re}(\chi_0e^{i\theta})\), \(\partial_t\chi\) has amplitude \(-i\omega\chi_0\) and \(\nabla\chi\) has amplitude \(i\vec k\chi_0\), so \(\varphi_0\mapsto\varphi_0 + i\omega\chi_0\), \(\vec A_0\mapsto\vec A_0 + i\vec k\chi_0\). Choose \(\chi_0 = i\varphi_0/\omega\): then \(\varphi_0' = \varphi_0 - \varphi_0 = 0\) and \(\vec A_0' = \vec A_0 - \vec k\varphi_0/\omega\). Then \[ \vec k\cdot\vec A_0' = \frac{\omega\varphi_0}{c^2} - \frac{|\vec k|^2\varphi_0}{\omega} = \frac{\varphi_0}{\omega c^2}\big(\omega^2 - c^2|\vec k|^2\big) = 0 . \]

4. With \(\varphi = 0\) and \(\vec k\cdot\vec A_0' = 0\), \(\vec E_0 = i\omega\vec A_0'\) and \(\vec B_0 = i\vec k\times\vec A_0'\). The map \(\vec A_0'\mapsto\vec E_0\) is injective, so distinct \(\vec A_0'\) in the plane \(\vec k^\perp\subset\mathbb C^3\) give distinct fields, and every transverse \(\vec E_0\) arises. The plane is two-dimensional: two polarisations. Of the four components of \((\varphi,\vec A_0)\), the Lorenz condition removed one and the residual gauge another.

Check. Dimensions: \([\chi_0] = [\varphi_0]\,\mathrm T\) ✓ since \(\varphi\mapsto\varphi - \partial_t\chi\). The fields are unchanged, as a gauge transformation must leave them: \(\vec E_0 = -i\vec k\varphi_0 + i\omega\vec A_0\) before, and \(i\omega(\vec A_0 - \vec k\varphi_0/\omega) = i\omega\vec A_0 - i\vec k\varphi_0\) after ✓.

P8 Same fields, two gauges hard

exercises: potentials of a moving point charge in Lorenz and in Coulomb gauge, an explicit gauge function, why an instantaneous potential is harmless, a number

A point charge \(q\) moves along the \(x\)-axis with constant speed \(v \lt c\): \(\rho = q\,\delta(x - vt)\delta(y)\delta(z)\), \(\vec J = \rho v\hat x\). Write \(\xi = x - vt\), \(s = \sqrt{y^2 + z^2}\), \(\gamma = (1 - v^2/c^2)^{-1/2}\).

  1. Explain why the retarded (Lorenz-gauge) potentials are functions of \((\xi, y, z)\) only.
  2. Substituting \(\varphi = f(\xi,y,z)\) into \(\Box\varphi = \rho/\varepsilon_0\), find \(\varphi_\mathrm L = \dfrac{q\gamma}{4\pi\varepsilon_0\sqrt{\gamma^2\xi^2 + s^2}}\), and show \(\vec A_\mathrm L = (v/c^2)\varphi_\mathrm L\hat x\) satisfies the Lorenz condition.
  3. In Coulomb gauge, \(\varphi_\mathrm C = q/(4\pi\varepsilon_0\sqrt{\xi^2 + s^2})\): the Coulomb potential of where the charge is now. Show that \(\chi = -\dfrac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0v}\Big[\operatorname{arsinh}\dfrac{\gamma\xi}{s} - \operatorname{arsinh}\dfrac{\xi}{s} + \ln\gamma\Big]\) satisfies \(\varphi_\mathrm C = \varphi_\mathrm L - \partial_t\chi\), and that \(\vec A_\mathrm C = \vec A_\mathrm L + \nabla\chi\) has zero divergence.
  4. Compute \(\vec E\) and \(\vec B\) from the Lorenz potentials. Why are the Coulomb-gauge fields identical, and why are they causal although \(\varphi_\mathrm C\) is instantaneous?
  5. At \(v = 0.6c\), compare the field strength at distance \(r\) perpendicular to the motion (\(\xi = 0\)) with that at the same distance along it (\(s = 0\)).
Hints · 4 rungs
Rung 1

Two sets of potentials, a gauge function relating them, one pair of fields, and a ratio. The key technique in part 2 is to turn the wave operator, acting on a travelling function, into a Laplacian by stretching one coordinate.

Rung 2

Part 1: the source is unchanged by \((x, t)\mapsto(x + vs', t + s')\), and the retarded integral commutes with translations. Part 2: on \(f(\xi,y,z)\), \(\partial_t = -v\partial_\xi\) and \(\partial_x = \partial_\xi\), so \(\Box f = -(\gamma^{-2}f_{\xi\xi} + f_{yy} + f_{zz})\); now put \(\xi = u/\gamma\).

Rung 3

Part 3: \(\partial_t\chi = -v\partial_\xi\chi\) and \(\frac{\mathrm d}{\mathrm dw}\operatorname{arsinh}w = (1 + w^2)^{-1/2}\). For the divergence, show \(\partial_t(\nabla^2\chi + \nabla\cdot\vec A_\mathrm L) = 0\) using \(\Box\varphi_\mathrm L = \rho/\varepsilon_0\) and \(\nabla^2\varphi_\mathrm C = -\rho/\varepsilon_0\).

Rung 4

First line of part 4: \(\vec E = -\nabla\varphi_\mathrm L - \partial_t\vec A_\mathrm L\) with \(\partial_t\vec A_\mathrm L = -\frac{v^2}{c^2}\partial_\xi\varphi_\mathrm L\hat x\), so \(E_x = -\gamma^{-2}\partial_\xi\varphi_\mathrm L\), \(E_y = -\partial_y\varphi_\mathrm L\), \(E_z = -\partial_z\varphi_\mathrm L\).

Worked solution

Idea. Uniform motion makes everything a function of the comoving coordinates, and the wave operator becomes a stretched Laplacian. The Coulomb-gauge potential is instantaneous; the field is not, because the gauge function carries the difference.

1. Let \(T_{s'}\) translate spacetime by \((vs', 0, 0, s')\). The source satisfies \(\rho\circ T_{s'} = \rho\), and the retarded integral \(\varphi(\vec x,t) = \frac1{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int\rho(\vec y, t - |\vec x - \vec y|/c)/|\vec x - \vec y|\) commutes with translations (substitute \(\vec y\mapsto\vec y + vs'\hat x\)). So \(\varphi(x + vs', y, z, t + s') = \varphi(x,y,z,t)\) for all \(s'\): \(\varphi\) depends on \(x\) and \(t\) only through \(x - vt\). The same for \(\vec A\).

2. On \(f(\xi,y,z)\), \(c^{-2}\partial_t^2f = (v^2/c^2)f_{\xi\xi}\), so \(\Box f = -\big((1 - v^2/c^2)f_{\xi\xi} + f_{yy} + f_{zz}\big) = -(\gamma^{-2}f_{\xi\xi} + f_{yy} + f_{zz})\). The equation \(\Box f = \rho/\varepsilon_0\) becomes \(\gamma^{-2}f_{\xi\xi} + f_{yy} + f_{zz} = -\frac q{\varepsilon_0}\delta(\xi)\delta(y)\delta(z)\). Put \(u = \gamma\xi\): \(\gamma^{-2}f_{\xi\xi} = f_{uu}\) and \(\delta(\xi) = \delta(u/\gamma) = \gamma\,\delta(u)\), so \[ f_{uu} + f_{yy} + f_{zz} = -\frac{q\gamma}{\varepsilon_0}\delta(u)\delta(y)\delta(z), \] Poisson's equation for a point charge \(q\gamma\) in the variables \((u,y,z)\). The solution decaying at infinity (unit 23) is \(f = q\gamma/4\pi\varepsilon_0\sqrt{u^2 + y^2 + z^2}\), which is the stated \(\varphi_\mathrm L\). Each component of \(\vec A\) obeys the same equation with \(\rho/\varepsilon_0\) replaced by \(\mu_0J_i\), and \(\mu_0\vec J = \mu_0\varepsilon_0v\hat x\cdot\rho/\varepsilon_0\), so \(\vec A_\mathrm L = (v/c^2)\varphi_\mathrm L\hat x\). Lorenz: \(\nabla\cdot\vec A_\mathrm L = \frac v{c^2}\partial_\xi\varphi_\mathrm L\) and \(c^{-2}\partial_t\varphi_\mathrm L = -\frac v{c^2}\partial_\xi\varphi_\mathrm L\); the sum is \(0\) ✓.

3. \(\partial_t\chi = -v\partial_\xi\chi = \frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\Big[\frac{\gamma/s}{\sqrt{1 + \gamma^2\xi^2/s^2}} - \frac{1/s}{\sqrt{1 + \xi^2/s^2}}\Big] = \frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\Big[\frac{\gamma}{\sqrt{s^2 + \gamma^2\xi^2}} - \frac{1}{\sqrt{s^2 + \xi^2}}\Big] = \varphi_\mathrm L - \varphi_\mathrm C\), so \(\varphi_\mathrm L - \partial_t\chi = \varphi_\mathrm C\) ✓. For the divergence, let \(D = \nabla^2\chi + \nabla\cdot\vec A_\mathrm L = \nabla\cdot\vec A_\mathrm C\). Then \[ \partial_tD = \nabla^2(\varphi_\mathrm L - \varphi_\mathrm C) - c^{-2}\partial_t^2\varphi_\mathrm L = -\Box\varphi_\mathrm L - \nabla^2\varphi_\mathrm C = -\frac\rho{\varepsilon_0} + \frac\rho{\varepsilon_0} = 0, \] using the Lorenz condition \(\partial_t\nabla\cdot\vec A_\mathrm L = -c^{-2}\partial_t^2\varphi_\mathrm L\). Since \(D\) is also a function of \((\xi,y,z)\), \(\partial_tD = -v\partial_\xi D = 0\) makes \(D\) independent of \(\xi\). As \(\xi\to-\infty\) at fixed \(s \gt 0\), \(\operatorname{arsinh}w = -\ln(2|w|) + o(1)\) for \(w\to-\infty\), so the bracket tends to \(-\ln(2\gamma|\xi|/s) + \ln(2|\xi|/s) + \ln\gamma = 0\), and \(\chi\) and its derivatives tend to \(0\), as does \(\nabla\cdot\vec A_\mathrm L\). So \(D\equiv0\): Coulomb gauge ✓.

4. From the last rung, with \(\partial_\xi\varphi_\mathrm L = -\frac{q\gamma\cdot\gamma^2\xi}{4\pi\varepsilon_0(\gamma^2\xi^2 + s^2)^{3/2}}\) and similarly in \(y, z\): \[ \vec E = \frac{q\gamma\,(\xi,\ y,\ z)}{4\pi\varepsilon_0(\gamma^2\xi^2 + y^2 + z^2)^{3/2}},\qquad \vec B = \frac{\vec v\times\vec E}{c^2}. \] \(\vec E\) points away from the charge's present position. For \(\vec B\): \(\nabla\times(\frac v{c^2}\varphi_\mathrm L\hat x) = -\frac v{c^2}\hat x\times\nabla\varphi_\mathrm L\), and \(\hat x\times\vec E = -\hat x\times\nabla\varphi_\mathrm L\) because \(\partial_t\vec A_\mathrm L\parallel\hat x\); so \(\vec B = \frac v{c^2}\hat x\times\vec E\). The Coulomb-gauge fields are identical because the two pairs of potentials differ by the gauge transformation of part 3, and the fields are gauge-invariant (the deck's theorem). They are causal because the Lorenz-gauge potentials are retarded integrals, which at \((\vec x,t)\) use the source only on the past light cone. That the field points from the present position is not a signal from the present: for uniform motion the past determines the present, and the field is built from the past. Had the charge been stopped abruptly, the field outside the sphere of radius \(c\times\)(time since stopping) would still point from where it would have been.

5. At \(\xi = 0\), \(s = r\): \(|\vec E| = q\gamma/4\pi\varepsilon_0r^2\). At \(s = 0\), \(|\xi| = r\): \(|\vec E| = q\gamma r/4\pi\varepsilon_0\gamma^3r^3 = q/4\pi\varepsilon_0\gamma^2r^2\). Ratio \(\gamma^3 = 1.25^3 = 1.953\): the field is compressed towards the plane perpendicular to the motion.

Check. \(v\to0\): \(\gamma\to1\), \(\varphi_\mathrm L = \varphi_\mathrm C\), \(\vec A\to\vec 0\); the bracket in \(\chi\) is \(O(\gamma - 1) = O(v^2/c^2)\), so \(\chi = O(v)\to0\), and \(\vec E\) is Coulomb's ✓. Dimensions: \([q/\varepsilon_0v] = \mathrm{V\,m}/(\mathrm{m\,s^{-1}}) = \mathrm{V\,s}\), so \(\partial_t\chi\) is in volts, like \(\varphi\) ✓. Gauss's law: the flux of \(\vec E\) through any sphere about the present position is \(q/\varepsilon_0\) — it must be, as \(\vec E\) solves Maxwell's equations.

The wave operator's Green's functions

P9 A second road to the retarded Green's function medium

exercises: the time transform of a PDE, the Helmholtz equation, distributional Laplacians, causality as analyticity in the upper half-plane

Transform only in time: \(\hat G(\vec x,\omega) = \int G(\vec x,t)e^{i\omega t}\,\mathrm dt\).

  1. Show that \(\Box G = \delta(t)\delta^{(3)}(\vec x)\) becomes \((\nabla^2 + k^2)\hat G = -\delta^{(3)}\) with \(k = \omega/c\).
  2. Prove that for real \(k\) both \(e^{\pm ikr}/4\pi r\) satisfy it, as distributions on \(\mathbb R^3\).
  3. Use unit 20's causality theorem to decide which to keep.
  4. Invert the time transform, and say where the \(i0\) prescription of the deck has gone.
Hints · 3 rungs
Rung 1

The answer is again \(\delta(t - r/c)/4\pi r\); the route is different. The causal choice is decided by which of two functions of \(\omega\) stays bounded when \(\omega\) moves into the upper half-plane.

Rung 2

For part 2 split \(e^{ikr} = \cos kr + i\sin kr\). The function \(\sin(kr)/r\) is smooth on \(\mathbb R^3\) (its series has only even powers of \(r\)); \(\cos(kr)\) is smooth too. Use \(\nabla^2(1/4\pi r) = -\delta^{(3)}\) from unit 23 and the product rule for a smooth function times \(1/4\pi r\).

Rung 3

First line of part 2: for a smooth radial \(f(r)\), \(\nabla^2\big(\frac{f}{4\pi r}\big) = -f(0)\delta^{(3)} + \frac{f''(r)}{4\pi r}\), because the cross term \(2\nabla f\cdot\nabla\frac1{4\pi r} = -\frac{2f'}{4\pi r^2}\) cancels the \(\frac{2f'}{r}\) in \(\nabla^2f = f'' + \frac{2f'}{r}\).

Worked solution

Idea. Transforming in time turns the wave equation into the Helmholtz equation, which has an outgoing and an incoming spherical wave. Causality — holomorphy in the upper half-plane — keeps the outgoing one.

1. Under the time transform \(\partial_t\mapsto-i\omega\), so \(c^{-2}\partial_t^2\mapsto-\omega^2/c^2 = -k^2\), and \(\widehat{\delta(t)} = 1\). So \(-k^2\hat G - \nabla^2\hat G = \delta^{(3)}\), i.e. \((\nabla^2 + k^2)\hat G = -\delta^{(3)}\).

2. Let \(f\) be smooth and radial. As distributions, \(\nabla^2(f\Gamma) = f\nabla^2\Gamma + 2\nabla f\cdot\nabla\Gamma + \Gamma\nabla^2f\) with \(\Gamma = 1/4\pi r\); the product rule holds because \(\Gamma\) and \(\nabla\Gamma\) are locally integrable (integrate by parts against a test function, cutting out a small ball as in unit 23). With \(f\nabla^2\Gamma = -f(0)\delta\), \(\nabla f\cdot\nabla\Gamma = -f'/4\pi r^2\) and \(\nabla^2f = f'' + 2f'/r\): \(\nabla^2(f\Gamma) = -f(0)\delta + f''/4\pi r\). For \(f = \cos kr\) (smooth: \(\cos kr = \sum(-1)^nk^{2n}r^{2n}/(2n)!\) is a power series in \(|\vec x|^2\)): \((\nabla^2 + k^2)\frac{\cos kr}{4\pi r} = -\delta + \frac{-k^2\cos kr + k^2\cos kr}{4\pi r} = -\delta\). And \(g = \sin(kr)/r\) is smooth with \(rg = \sin kr\), so \(\nabla^2g = \frac1r(rg)'' = -k^2g\) for \(r \gt 0\), hence everywhere by continuity: \((\nabla^2 + k^2)g = 0\). So \(\frac{e^{\pm ikr}}{4\pi r} = \frac{\cos kr}{4\pi r}\pm\frac{i}{4\pi}\frac{\sin kr}{r}\) both satisfy the equation. \(\square\)

3. Unit 20: \(G(\vec x,\cdot)\) vanishes for \(t \lt 0\) exactly when its transform extends holomorphically to \(\operatorname{Im}\omega \gt 0\) and is suitably bounded there. For \(\omega = \omega_1 + i\omega_2\) with \(\omega_2 \gt 0\), \(|e^{i\omega r/c}| = e^{-\omega_2r/c}\le1\), while \(|e^{-i\omega r/c}| = e^{\omega_2r/c}\) grows without bound. So \(\hat G_\mathrm{ret} = e^{i\omega r/c}/4\pi r\), the outgoing wave (with \(e^{-i\omega t}\), its phase is constant on \(r = ct + \)const).

4. \(G(\vec x,t) = \frac{1}{4\pi r}\cdot\frac1{2\pi}\int e^{-i\omega(t - r/c)}\,\mathrm d\omega = \frac{\delta(t - r/c)}{4\pi r}\), by unit 20's \(\hat1 = 2\pi\delta\) (shifted). The \(i0\) prescription is now in the choice of sign: evaluating \(e^{\pm ikr}\) at \(k = (\omega + i\varepsilon)/c\) and letting \(\varepsilon\to0^+\) singles out \(e^{+ikr}\), the only one that stays bounded. It is the same prescription seen from a different variable.

Check. \(\omega = 0\): \(\hat G = 1/4\pi r\), the Coulomb Green's function, which is also \(\int G\,\mathrm dt\) ✓. The incoming choice gives \(\delta(t + r/c)/4\pi r\), the deck's \(G_\mathrm{adv}\) ✓. Dimensions: \([\hat G] = [G]\,\mathrm T = \mathrm L^{-1}\) ✓.

P10 Kirchhoff focuses a spherical pulse medium

exercises: spherical means, Kirchhoff's formula, the strong Huygens principle, a number

Solve \(\Box u = 0\) in \(\mathbb R^3\) with \(u_t = 0\) at \(t = 0\) and \(u(\vec x, 0) = g(\vec x) = 1 - |\vec x|^2/R^2\) for \(|\vec x|\le R\), \(0\) otherwise.

  1. Compute \(M_r[g](\vec 0)\) for all \(r\ge0\).
  2. Use Kirchhoff's formula to find \(u(\vec 0, t)\) for \(t \gt 0\).
  3. Evaluate \(u(\vec 0,0)\), \(u(\vec 0, R/2c)\), the limit as \(t\to R/c\) from below, and \(u(\vec 0,t)\) for \(t \gt R/c\).
  4. Explain the value at \(t\to R/c^-\), and why \(u(\vec 0,t)\) is exactly zero afterwards.
Hints · 3 rungs
Rung 1

The answer is an explicit function of \(t\), piecewise polynomial. Only the \(g\)-term of Kirchhoff's formula contributes, and at the centre the spherical mean of a radial function is trivial.

Rung 2

\(g\) depends only on \(|\vec x|\), so on the sphere of radius \(r\) about the origin it is constant. Then \(u(\vec 0,t) = \partial_t\big(t\,M_{ct}[g](\vec 0)\big)\).

Rung 3

First line: \(M_r[g](\vec 0) = 1 - r^2/R^2\) for \(r\le R\) and \(0\) for \(r \gt R\), so for \(ct \lt R\), \(u(\vec 0,t) = \frac{\mathrm d}{\mathrm dt}\big[t(1 - c^2t^2/R^2)\big]\).

Worked solution

Idea. At the centre a spherical pulse is the average over the sphere that is arriving now. The inward-moving half of the pulse converges and grows; once every sphere about the centre has left the support, nothing is left — not a tail, exactly nothing.

1. \(M_r[g](\vec 0) = g\) evaluated at radius \(r\): \(1 - r^2/R^2\) for \(r\le R\), \(0\) for \(r \gt R\).

2. With \(h = 0\), \(u(\vec 0,t) = \partial_t\big(t\,M_{ct}[g](\vec 0)\big)\). For \(0\le t \lt R/c\): \(\partial_t\big(t - c^2t^3/R^2\big) = 1 - 3c^2t^2/R^2\). For \(t \gt R/c\): \(\partial_t(0) = 0\).

3. \(u(\vec 0,0) = 1\) ✓ (the initial datum at the centre). \(u(\vec 0, R/2c) = 1 - \frac34 = 0.25\). As \(t\to R/c^-\): \(1 - 3 = -2\). For \(t \gt R/c\): exactly \(0\).

4. The initial bump splits into an outgoing and an ingoing spherical wave. The ingoing one converges on the centre, and its amplitude grows like \(1/r\) as it focuses; it arrives with the sign reversed (the \(\partial_t\) in Kirchhoff's formula differentiates the profile, and the steep inner edge of the average gives a large negative derivative). The value \(-2\) is \(-2\) times the initial height. The jump from \(-2\) to \(0\) at \(t = R/c\) comes from the kink of \(g\) at \(|\vec x| = R\), where \(g'\) jumps from \(-2/R\) to \(0\): the formula differentiates it. After \(t = R/c\) every sphere about the centre of radius \(ct \gt R\) lies outside the support of the data, and by the strong Huygens principle \(u(\vec 0, t)\) depends on the data on that sphere only. So it is \(0\).

Check. Dimensions: \(u\) has \(g\)'s units, and \(c^2t^2/R^2\) is dimensionless ✓. A second route: for radial solutions \(ru\) solves the one-dimensional wave equation (Darboux's identity), so \(ru = \frac12[F(r + ct) + F(r - ct)]\) with \(F(\sigma) = \sigma g(|\sigma|)\), an odd extension. Then \(u(0,t) = \lim_{r\to0}\frac{F(r+ct) + F(r-ct)}{2r} = F'(ct) = \frac{\mathrm d}{\mathrm d\sigma}\big[\sigma(1 - \sigma^2/R^2)\big]_{\sigma = ct} = 1 - 3c^2t^2/R^2\) ✓. (The data are only \(C^1\) at \(|\vec x| = R\), so this is a solution in the weak sense there; away from the sphere \(ct = R\) it is classical.)

P11 Huygens fails in two dimensions hard

exercises: the method of descent, changing variables inside a delta, supports of Green's functions, a number

  1. Obtain the two-dimensional retarded Green's function by descent: \(G_2(\varrho, t) = \int_{-\infty}^\infty G_\mathrm{ret}\big(\sqrt{\varrho^2 + z^2}, t\big)\,\mathrm dz\), and show \(G_2 = \dfrac{c\,H(ct - \varrho)}{2\pi\sqrt{c^2t^2 - \varrho^2}}\).
  2. Show that \(G_2\) satisfies the two-dimensional wave equation at every point with \(ct \gt \varrho \gt 0\). Conclude that \(G_2\) is supported in the solid cone, not on its surface, and that the strong Huygens principle fails in the plane.
  3. Descend once more: integrate \(G_2\) over \(y\) and show the result is \(\frac c2H(ct - |x|)\). Relate this to d'Alembert's formula (unit 18).
  4. At a fixed distance \(\varrho\), by what factor has \(G_2\) fallen between \(t = 2\varrho/c\) and \(t = 10\varrho/c\)? What is its behaviour as \(t\to\infty\)?
Hints · 4 rungs
Rung 1

Three Green's functions — in three, two and one dimensions — related by integrating out a coordinate, then a ratio. The main technical point is how a delta function of a function of \(z\) is integrated.

Rung 2

The integrand is even in \(z\). On \(z \gt 0\) substitute \(\sigma = \sqrt{\varrho^2 + z^2}\), so \(\mathrm dz = \sigma\,\mathrm d\sigma/\sqrt{\sigma^2 - \varrho^2}\), and use \(\delta(t - \sigma/c) = c\,\delta(\sigma - ct)\).

Rung 3

For part 2, put \(w = c^2t^2 - x^2 - y^2\) and \(f = w^{-1/2}\); compute \(f_{tt}\), \(f_{xx}\), \(f_{yy}\) by the chain rule. For part 3, the \(y\)-integral of \((a^2 - y^2)^{-1/2}\) over \(|y| \lt a\) is \(\pi\).

Rung 4

First line of part 1: \(G_2 = 2\int_\varrho^\infty\frac{\delta(t - \sigma/c)}{4\pi\sigma}\,\frac{\sigma\,\mathrm d\sigma}{\sqrt{\sigma^2 - \varrho^2}} = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_\varrho^\infty\frac{\delta(t - \sigma/c)}{\sqrt{\sigma^2 - \varrho^2}}\,\mathrm d\sigma\).

Worked solution

Idea. A source uniform along a line is a two-dimensional source. Each point of the line sends a sharp spherical shell, but the shells from farther points arrive later, so the sum at a given point never stops arriving.

1. From the last rung, \(\delta(t - \sigma/c) = c\,\delta(\sigma - ct)\) picks out \(\sigma = ct\), which lies in the range \((\varrho, \infty)\) iff \(ct \gt \varrho\): \[ G_2(\varrho,t) = \frac{c}{2\pi\sqrt{c^2t^2 - \varrho^2}}\,H(ct - \varrho). \] Descent is legitimate because a \(z\)-independent source gives a \(z\)-independent retarded solution, on which \(\Box\) is the two-dimensional operator.

2. With \(w = c^2t^2 - \varrho^2\), \(f = w^{-1/2}\): \(f_t = -c^2tw^{-3/2}\), \(f_{tt} = -c^2w^{-3/2} + 3c^4t^2w^{-5/2}\); \(f_x = xw^{-3/2}\), \(f_{xx} = w^{-3/2} + 3x^2w^{-5/2}\), and the same in \(y\). So \[ c^{-2}f_{tt} - f_{xx} - f_{yy} = -w^{-3/2} + 3c^2t^2w^{-5/2} - 2w^{-3/2} - 3\varrho^2w^{-5/2} = -3w^{-3/2} + 3w\cdot w^{-5/2} = 0. \] So \(G_2\) is a nonzero classical solution throughout the interior \(ct \gt \varrho\). Its support is the whole solid cone; the solution of a 2D problem with data near the origin is therefore nonzero at \(\vec x\) for all \(t \gt |\vec x|/c\), not only near \(t = |\vec x|/c\). The strong principle fails. \(\square\)

3. With \(a = \sqrt{c^2t^2 - x^2}\) (when \(ct \gt |x|\)): \(\int G_2\,\mathrm dy = \frac c{2\pi}\int_{-a}^a\frac{\mathrm dy}{\sqrt{a^2 - y^2}} = \frac c{2\pi}\cdot\pi = \frac c2\), and \(0\) when \(ct \lt |x|\). So \(G_1 = \frac c2H(ct - |x|)\). Convolving with an initial velocity \(h\), with the deck's normalisation \(u = c^{-2}G_1 * h\): \(u = \frac1{2c}\int_{x - ct}^{x + ct}h\) — d'Alembert's formula ✓. In one dimension the tail does not even decay.

4. \(G_2\propto(c^2t^2 - \varrho^2)^{-1/2}\): at \(ct = 2\varrho\), \((3\varrho^2)^{-1/2}\); at \(ct = 10\varrho\), \((99\varrho^2)^{-1/2}\); ratio \(\sqrt{3/99} = 0.174\). As \(t\to\infty\), \(G_2\sim\frac{c}{2\pi ct} = \frac1{2\pi t}\): a tail decaying like \(1/t\), for ever.

Check. Dimensions: \([G_2] = \mathrm T^{-1}\) (the 2D delta has \(\mathrm T^{-1}\mathrm L^{-2}\) and the operator \(\mathrm L^{-2}\)), and \(c/\sqrt{c^2t^2 - \varrho^2}\) is \(\mathrm T^{-1}\) ✓. The three Green's functions in 1, 2, 3 dimensions: a step, a decaying tail, a spike — only three dimensions has sharp signals.

Radiation

P12 Larmor, from the retarded potential medium

exercises: the dipole approximation, differentiating retarded functions, angular integrals, a number

A charge \(q\) moves near the origin with velocity \(\vec v(t)\), \(|\vec v|\ll c\), and acceleration \(\vec a(t)\).

  1. Write the dipole-approximation vector potential at a distant point.
  2. Show that to leading order in \(1/r\), \(\vec B = \frac{\mu_0q}{4\pi cr}\,\vec a(t_\mathrm r)\times\hat r\), with \(t_\mathrm r = t - r/c\), naming the terms dropped.
  3. With \(\vec E = c\vec B\times\hat r\), find \(\vec S\) and the total power through a large sphere.
  4. An electron moves at \(1.00\times10^6\ \mathrm{m\,s^{-1}}\) in a circle in a uniform field of \(1.00\) T. Compute its radiated power and the time scale on which it loses its kinetic energy.
Hints · 3 rungs
Rung 1

A vector potential, a magnetic field, a power (the Larmor formula), then two numbers. The only calculus is differentiating \(f(t - r/c)/r\).

Rung 2

For a point charge \(\dot{\vec p} = q\vec v\). For \(\vec F(t - r/c)\), \(\partial_j\vec F(t - r/c) = -\frac{x_j}{cr}\dot{\vec F}\), which is of order \(1/c\) times a time derivative; differentiating \(1/r\) gives \(1/r^2\), which is dropped.

Rung 3

First line of part 2: \(\nabla\times\Big[\frac{\vec F(t_\mathrm r)}{r}\Big] = \frac1r\nabla t_\mathrm r\times\dot{\vec F} + \nabla\frac1r\times\vec F = -\frac{\hat r\times\dot{\vec F}}{cr} + O(r^{-2})\).

Worked solution

Idea. Differentiating a retarded function in space is, to leading order in \(1/r\), differentiating it in time times \(-\hat r/c\). The \(1/r\) fields carry a finite power to infinity.

1. \(\vec A(\vec x,t) = \frac{\mu_0}{4\pi r}q\vec v(t - r/c)\).

2. With \(\vec F = \frac{\mu_0q}{4\pi}\vec v\): \(\nabla t_\mathrm r = -\hat r/c\), so \(\vec B = -\frac{\mu_0q}{4\pi cr}\hat r\times\vec a + \nabla\frac1r\times\vec F = \frac{\mu_0q}{4\pi cr}\vec a\times\hat r + O(r^{-2})\). Dropped: the \(\nabla(1/r)\) term, of order \(\mu_0qv/r^2\), smaller than the kept one by \(cv/(ar)\sim cT/r\) (with \(T\) the time scale of the motion); and the corrections of the dipole approximation itself.

3. \(\vec E\perp\vec B\), \(|\vec E| = c|\vec B|\), and \(\vec E\times\vec B = c(\vec B\times\hat r)\times\vec B = c|\vec B|^2\hat r\) (as \(\vec B\perp\hat r\)). So \(\vec S = \frac{c}{\mu_0}|\vec B|^2\hat r = \frac{\mu_0q^2a^2\sin^2\theta}{16\pi^2cr^2}\hat r\), with \(\theta\) the angle between \(\vec a\) and \(\hat r\). Over a sphere, \(\int\sin^2\theta\,\mathrm d\Omega = \frac{8\pi}3\): \[ P = \frac{\mu_0q^2a^2}{6\pi c} = \frac{q^2a^2}{6\pi\varepsilon_0c^3}. \]

4. \(a = evB/m_e = (1.602\times10^{-19})(10^6)(1)/(9.109\times10^{-31}) = 1.759\times10^{17}\ \mathrm{m\,s^{-2}}\) (the orbit has radius \(m_ev/eB = 5.69\ \mu\)m). \(P = e^2a^2/6\pi\varepsilon_0c^3 = 1.77\times10^{-19}\) W. The kinetic energy is \(\frac12m_ev^2 = 4.55\times10^{-19}\) J (2.84 eV). Since \(P\propto a^2\propto v^2\propto\) kinetic energy, the energy decays exponentially with time constant \(\frac12m_ev^2/P = 2.58\) s.

Check. Dimensions: \([\mu_0q^2a^2/c] = \mathrm{N\,A^{-2}\,C^2\,m^2s^{-4}/(m\,s^{-1})} = \mathrm{N\,m\,s^{-1}} = \mathrm W\) ✓. Limit: \(\vec a = \vec 0\) gives \(P = 0\): a uniformly moving charge does not radiate (compare P8, whose fields fall as \(1/r^2\)) ✓. The time constant is independent of \(v\) — \(\tau = 3\pi\varepsilon_0m_e^3c^3/(e^4B^2)\) — so it applies to every non-relativistic electron in 1 T.

P13 The atom that should not exist medium

exercises: the Larmor formula applied, a slowly decaying orbit, checking one's own approximations, a number

Model hydrogen classically: an electron in a circular orbit of radius \(r\) about a fixed proton.

  1. Write its energy \(E(r)\) and acceleration \(a(r)\).
  2. Assuming the orbit stays nearly circular, use \(\dot E = -P\) and the Larmor formula to show \(\dot r = -\frac43r_e^2c/r^2\), with \(r_e = e^2/4\pi\varepsilon_0m_ec^2\).
  3. Find the time to fall from \(a_0\) to \(r = 0\), and evaluate it.
  4. Check the approximations: \(v/c\) at the start; the fraction of the energy lost in one orbit at \(a_0\); and the number of orbits before collapse.
  5. Say in one sentence what this computation shows.
Hints · 3 rungs
Rung 1

An ODE for \(r(t)\), separable, then a time of order \(10^{-11}\) s, then three dimensionless checks. Unit 08's circular orbit supplies \(E\) and \(a\).

Rung 2

For a circular orbit under \(e^2/4\pi\varepsilon_0r^2\), the kinetic energy is minus half the potential energy, so \(E = -e^2/8\pi\varepsilon_0r\). Differentiate: \(\dot E = \frac{e^2}{8\pi\varepsilon_0r^2}\dot r\).

Rung 3

First line: \(\frac{e^2}{8\pi\varepsilon_0r^2}\dot r = -\frac{e^2}{6\pi\varepsilon_0c^3}\Big(\frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0m_er^2}\Big)^2\).

Worked solution

Idea. An orbiting charge is accelerated, so it radiates; the energy comes from the orbit, which shrinks, which increases the acceleration. The spiral ends at the proton in about sixteen picoseconds.

1. \(a = e^2/4\pi\varepsilon_0m_er^2\) (centripetal, from Coulomb), \(m_ev^2 = e^2/4\pi\varepsilon_0r\), and \(E = \frac12m_ev^2 - \frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0r} = -\frac{e^2}{8\pi\varepsilon_0r}\).

2. Solving the last rung for \(\dot r\): \(\dot r = -\frac{8\pi\varepsilon_0r^2}{e^2}\cdot\frac{e^2}{6\pi\varepsilon_0c^3}\cdot\frac{e^4}{16\pi^2\varepsilon_0^2m_e^2r^4} = -\frac43c\Big(\frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0m_ec^2}\Big)^2\frac1{r^2} = -\frac43\frac{r_e^2c}{r^2}\).

3. Separate: \(r^2\,\mathrm dr = -\frac43r_e^2c\,\mathrm dt\), so \(\frac{a_0^3}{3} = \frac43r_e^2c\,t\) and \[ t_\mathrm{collapse} = \frac{a_0^3}{4r_e^2c}. \] With \(r_e = 2.8179\times10^{-15}\) m and \(a_0 = 5.2918\times10^{-11}\) m: \(t = (5.2918\times10^{-11})^3/(4\times(2.8179\times10^{-15})^2\times2.9979\times10^8) = 1.56\times10^{-11}\) s.

4. At \(a_0\), \(v/c = \sqrt{e^2/4\pi\varepsilon_0m_ea_0}/c = 7.30\times10^{-3} = 1/137\): non-relativistic ✓. The initial power is \(4.67\times10^{-8}\) W and the period \(T_0 = 1.52\times10^{-16}\) s, so the energy lost per orbit is \(PT_0/|E| = 4.67\times10^{-8}\times1.52\times10^{-16}/2.18\times10^{-18} = 3.3\times10^{-6}\) of the binding energy: the orbit is circular to excellent accuracy ✓. Number of orbits: the period scales as \(r^{3/2}\), so \(N = \int\mathrm dt/T(r) = \int_0^{a_0}\frac{3r^2}{4r_e^2c}\frac{\mathrm dr}{T_0(r/a_0)^{3/2}} = \frac{a_0^3}{2r_e^2cT_0} = \frac{2t_\mathrm{collapse}}{T_0} = 2.05\times10^5\). The approximations fail only at the very end, as \(v\to c\) — too late to matter.

5. Classical mechanics and classical electrodynamics together predict that every atom collapses in \(10^{-11}\) s, and atoms do not: the theory is wrong about matter, and the repair (quantum mechanics) lies outside this course, which records the failure and does not attempt it.

Check. Dimensions: \([a_0^3/r_e^2c] = \mathrm{m^3/(m^2\,m\,s^{-1})} = \mathrm s\) ✓. Scaling: a larger orbit lasts much longer, as \(a_0^3\) — a classical "atom" of radius 1 cm would last \(1.05\times10^{14}\) s, about three million years. The Larmor power at \(a_0\) against the binding energy \(13.6\) eV gives \(|E|/P = 4.7\times10^{-11}\) s, the right order ✓.